patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Zoning Opponents Deliver 16,000 More Signatures

First deadline for turning in signatures closes at the end of business Monday.

 

Two groups that are attempting to force some zoning changes to the 2014 ballot submitted an addition 16,000 signatures Monday.

The groups, the Committee for Zoning Integrity and the Committee for Zoning Transparency, delivered the additional signatures to the Baltimore County Board of Elections.

On Friday, the groups delivered more than 70,000 total signatures—34,000 signatures for the petition on the 6th district zoning issues and another 36,662 on the 2nd Council District.

The additional signatures delivered Monday come as the first deadline passes for the referendum effort.

Opponents of the bills, backed by developers including David Cordish and David S. Brown Enterprises, must submit at least 28,826 verified signatures of Baltimore County voters. The group can buy itself an extra 30-days if they can reach at least 9,513.

The signatures will take several days to verify.

Related Topics: 2014 Elections, 2014 referendum, Baltimore County Comprehensive Zoning Map Process, Baltimore County Council, Bryan Sears, Cathy Bevins, David Cordish, David S. Brown Enterprises, Vicki Almond, and insider politics

Comment_arrow

ZIG

8:14 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012

We have spoke. Our council has spoke. Special interests have betrayed us.

Blue Alpha

8:28 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012

What's shameful is Vicki Almond's belief that some how business owners don't have the same rights as individuals. When residents fight something in their neighborhood to protect their property values, that's the American democractic process. When a business or commercial property owner defends their property values, some how that's un-Democratic. No wonder Virginia and Pennsylvania get more new jobs than Maryland. We're such a business unfriendly State even at the County level.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JBC

8:59 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012

Arn't we a capitalist society as well? If businesses are afraid of competition, they should do something to make their own good or service more appealing.

Comment_arrow

Maryland

9:10 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012

Maybe if those business owners would have put their name on their opposition, I'd agree with you, but they hid behind front groups to fight these projects. The referendum process doesn't afford them the same ability to hide as the initial zoning battle, but they tried nonetheless. Say No To Solo, Fix The Maps, Committee for Zoning Integrity (or is it Transparency?) tried to mislead the public into thinking this was all a grassroots ordeal. Fixthemaps.com appealed to a "public mandate for more meaningful public input and less prioritization for the concerns of special interests and developers, many of whom are regular contributors to Council campaign accounts", but Howard Brown's attorney is on the authority line! Anyone fooled by this charade should be embarrassed, and any resident of Owings Mills or Middle River should be outraged.

Blue Alpha

9:11 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012

How exactly does an office building owner make his goods and services more appealing when one new project approved by the County makes the traffic fail at his front entrance? Are you saying - tough luck - know you're buildings been there for over a decade but now your traffic pattern doesn't work?

Reply

Blue Alpha

9:18 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012

Maryland - how about the resident of Owings Mills who owns the Safeway Center - should he be outraged that Solo will make his center so much less valuable. At least be reasonable and see the other side - even if you don't agree with it.

Reply

Pam Miller

9:25 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012

My husband and I were asked to sign this petition in the parking lot of Sam's Club in Owings Mills. We signed it but of course the guy collecting signatures was not honest about it. If we had know that the developer of Owings Mills Mall was behind this petition, we would not have signed it. There is plenty of room in Owings Mills for Foundry Row and Owings Mills Mall. The developer/owner of Owings Mills Mall needs to rework it since past history has shown that it is not a good mall. Make it like Hunt Valley or the avenue at White Marsh. I know that if this makes it to referencum, we will vote against it. Shame on you for this petition and not telling the truth!

Reply

Maryland

10:01 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012

You missed my point, Blue Alpha. Opposition is fine if a business owner wants to own up to it, but faking a grassroots movement and pretending the community opposes the project that he's competing with is pathetic.

Reply

ReisterstownMAN

6:20 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

I have yet to meet one person opposed to WEGMANS coming into Owings Mills.
Everyone I have talked to signed that stupid petition (WAS LIED TO)!
Either way.....Wegmans will be coming to Owings Mills and to the SOLO Site and not to the Mall Crappy Site...
The mall owners after 30 years failed to do anything good with the mall and so now they are looking for sympathy from the community....After their big announcement 2 years ago that they will start work ASAP..? What have any of you seen happen at the mall? Here...I will answer.....5 Jewelry thefts.....Organized retail crime to Macy's and JCP.....there is 1 security gaurd who is 80 that walks the mall...The mall is flooded after it rains....they put buckets every 5 feet to keep the water in....
So again, I ask what has the mall done to show they are willing to do anything there. They are hiding behind the facts that a new store wants to open up and we as the community want it bad and need it.
The economy is bad we all know this. Why not welcome a new business when times are so tough?

Reply

PerryHallCrafter

6:48 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

I would welcome a Wegmans to my community! The shopping center in Timonium that has Wegmans gets my business all the time, especially Greetings and Readings. It's a well laid out, pleasant place to shop. Malls? Yawn. Yes, I will admit I love Boscov's, but not enough to really spend time in the mall at White Marsh. The mall is filled with foul mouthed, unattended teens and I can't imagine Owings Mills mall being any more 'dead' than it was the last time I was out there, which was years and years ago. Malls are boring, outdated concepts and places like the Avenue and others like it are the new shopping way.

Reply

HDEnov

7:09 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

If you feel you were misled about the petition you signed, request to have your name removed:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=508103515867269&set=a.442166749127613.105954.442104229133865&type=1&theater

Perhaps if enough individuals write to the elections board, they will realize many aspects of the petiton were fraudelent and dishonest.

Reply

Buck Harmon

7:54 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

We live in a Republic, not a Democracy....the majority does not rule...the rule of law does. The outcome of this powerful developer debate,(or war) will ultimately be determined by law, not citizens. The illusion continues...

Reply

Chuck Burton

9:30 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

So, let's suppose Mr Brown is able to stop zoning for Wegmans and other retail in Foundry Row. Doesn't he realize this would hurt prospects for his Metro Centre, etc.? Wouldn't people be more likely to want to live in the apartments there, if they had such a desireable store nearby? And, am I wrong to believe that, under existing zoning, GG could just develop the Row as an office center in competition with Brown's Metro? Mr Brown needs to shake the cobwebs out of his bean.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chuck Burton

9:38 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Addendum for those who are worried about the traffic problems: Wegmans, etc., will have traffic mostly spread out through the whole day - imagine what it will be like in rush hours with all those office workers trying to enter or exit at the same time.

Blue Alpha

9:45 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

You have no clue how groceries work. The busiest times are right after work and weekends. Mr. Brown's portfolio includes huge holdings in Owings Mills. If, sorry, when Wegmans' traffic (most of which according to GG will come from outside of Owings Mills) clogs local roads, all of his properties will be devalued. People wil parachute into Wegmans and then get out of the area. Local people will avoid those roads and areas. Heck - a good chunk of Hunt Valley is empty with a Wegmans and the restaurants there thrive on the movie business. You just don't understand the issues you're talking about.

Reply
Comment_arrow

ReisterstownMAN

10:37 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Alpha...what the heck are you talking about?
How often in a day....do you drive on Reisterstown rd that you are so worried about traffic?
why dont you go during the day to the hunt valley area (MONDAY-FRIDAY) during noon and see how busy they are....guess you want to see more empty buildings on reisterstown rd growing grass on cement such as 5 different properties...thats what you want. good citizen

Comment_arrow

ddbs00

11:12 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

You must have never been to a Wegmans if you think you can just "parachute in," get what you need, and then leave. Wegmans is a destination not a stopover.

Comment_arrow

Maryland

12:15 pm on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Blue Alpha is awfully protective of Howard Brown. What do you have to say about the 1,700 apartments, 1.2 million square feet of office, and 300,000 square feet of retail going in to Metro Centre, all with no public input, no offsite traffic improvements, and a $57 million handout from the state and county?

3NJ

9:52 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

It's shameful how these signatures are uptained. The person asked if i would sign, would not give me a second to read the petition. Repeated his spiel 3 times and when I said no I don't have time to read the petition, he argued then repeated another three times that im not voting on anything today all I have to do is sign it. Its disgusting, let's intimidate a mom walking with 2 two year olds.

Reply

wakeupchuck

10:06 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Mr. Burton:

You seem to have adopted a "Wegmans at any cost" mentality. Why can't you understand that a failing intersection will mean devastation to all projects? And, that is what surely will happen if Foundy Row is built at that corner. You have stars in your eyes when Wegmans is mentioned and you don't seem to be able to think rationally. Stand on that corner during rush hour some day this week and envision three Wegmans (the equivalent of what they hope to build) sitting there and get back to me on your thoughts.

Reply
Comment_arrow

ReisterstownMAN

10:35 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

3 wegmans?
wow exaggeration....a lil much there chuckles

ReisterstownMAN

10:34 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

I dont live across the street so traffic will not bother me or my family..
I dont drive on Reisterstown Rd nor am I worried about a little traffic..
I guess you guys want buildings to just stand there with no vision..
check out the old furniture store near bed bath and beyond...or the franks building or krispy kremes across street from solo or shoppers building and movie theater...
these are the buildings that stand and this is how they will stand because of people like you who dont see that in this economy you take what you can get...
this is a positive for the area not a negative...
a little traffic near your home will depreciate your house that you live in? get a life...
do you live across the street? I dont think you do...how will this depreciate your house...?
There are homes within a 5 mile radious of the wegmans in hunt valley and the community loves it.
Ask anyone in the area, they dont oppose a little traffic especially since the solo location property builders have plans....what plans does the mall owners have that you all follow?

Reply

Chuck Burton

10:51 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

People have to realize that SOMETHING is going to go in at the the corner of Reisterstown and Painters Mill. The idealists want a PARK - that would mostly be used by addicts and people with guns... and victims. That would certainly be great for area business. Anything else is going to involve traffic problems. So, if it's Wegmans, many people will drop in on their way home from work. Won't rush hour be largely over by the time they leave, so won't it effectively just spread the rush over a longer period, with less volume at any given moment? Isn't that better than all offices, for example, where all the workers are entering or leaving at a certain hour in the morning and again in the evening?

Reply
Comment_arrow

ddbs00

11:15 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

If anything should be turned into a park it's the Owings Mills Mall.

wakeupchuck

10:54 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Yes -- the EQUIVALENT of three Wegmans.

Wegmans is 140,000 square feet of space. Foundry Row is about 400,000 square feet of space. That's 260,000 additional space feet composed of clothing stores, liquor stores, book stores, fitness centers, restaurants and anything else you would like to imagine.

And, that means lots of traffic.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Maryland

12:22 pm on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Foundry Row is less than half the size of the mall, and less than 1/6 the size of Metro Centre, yet Wegmans gets the blame for traffic increases.

Michael

10:56 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

My biggest issue with the opponents to Wegman's trying to get this issue as a referendum is that people in Baltimore County who have no reason to be voting on it will have the ability to control what comes to Owings Mills. Why should a Dundalk or Catonsville resident have any say whatsoever about whether a Wegman's comes to Owings Mills. This was resolved with the County Council vote. Now the opponents need to live with it and move on. If you disapprove, don't shop there.

Reply

Rose Bognanni

11:08 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

It is my understanding if it goes to referdum, it will affect ALL zoning for this session...which means Nothing that has been passed would be valid.
Dear Mr Brown ad Co. I think you just shot your selfish self in the foot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chuck Burton

11:20 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

And the lawyers will LOVE it!!

Comment_arrow

Mike Pierce

1:21 pm on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

This referendum affects all the zoning in the 2nd District, even a good down-zoning that many people fought for, and is now probably lost.

The other one affects everything in the 6th District.

They don't affect the other 5 districts.

Comment_arrow

Michael

1:34 pm on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

And that is the problem with it going to referendum at all! Why should voters in the other 5 districts get any say on how the zoning is handled in the 2 in question?

If there is a problem with the way zoning is handled in Baltimore County, and I am not saying that there is or isn't, this is not the way to fix it. A change to the zoning process needs to be discussed, not a change to already determined zoning, just to please some unhappy business owners who may lose some money to competition.

Blue Alpha

11:10 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

So all of the people dying for Wegmans - please tell me your vision for filling the inevitable empty Giant and Safeway. While you're at it - fill the empty Bed Bath and Beyond as they're supposed to move to Foundry from the Toys R Us Center. Also, fill the empty Best Buy when HH Gregg goes to Foundry. What about filling all the empty liquor store spaces when a 10,000 square foot Wegmans family owned liquor store opens up next to Wegmans. I could go on. They can't keep Hunt Valley full but somehow this one project is going to magically cure what woes Owings Mills. Get real.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chuck Burton

11:46 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

1. If Giant and Safeway make their stores shopable and desireable, they will prosper.
2. Maybe Toys R Us (Babys R Us) will expand.
3. Best Buy seems to be on its way out, anyhow - a casualty of the battle between Amazon and Walmart.
4. Is HH Gregg going into the Row? I hadn't heard. I seems to have a better reputation than BB, anyway, and will IT survive the A-W battle?
5. There will be no Wegmans liquor store (unfortunately - as also no Trader Joe's). Howard county shot down that idea, and so will Baltimore county. the liquor lobby is too powerful.
6. I know there have been problems with Ray Lewis's project at Hunt Valley - is there anything else?

Comment_arrow

Maryland

12:26 pm on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

The owner of the St. Thomas Giant center supports Foundry Row, so maybe you should ask him. I can't say the same for Safeway, because according to The Sun this morning, their landlord spent $100K toward the astroturf referendum.

Comment_arrow

ReisterstownMAN

1:00 pm on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Alpha, first of Giant has 2 stores on Reisterstown Rd close to eachother...
they can close one and would be okay with it...they are garbage anyway....safeway also not a fan as many are not..

wakeupmichael

11:14 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Really, Michael? You think this is an Owings Mills-only issue? My goodness you don't seem to be paying attention. It is about the zoning process being hi-jacked and community members bypassed. All it took was to convince one councilperson -- then the rest (absent one) followed like soldiers. This is about protecting the interests of all Baltimore County businesses. The referendum actually places this back in the hands of the citizens, where it should be. One day you might understand that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael

11:27 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

I understand the issue just fine. I know this is not an Owings Mills only issue, but how do you separate the issue in Owings Mills from the other zoning issues? You can't say that you can only vote on the zoning issues in your area. My problem with "putting it back in the hands of the citizens", as you put it, is that it is not in the hands of the citizens most impacted by it, but in the hands of all of the citizens of Baltimore County. Frankly, the issue belongs in the hands of the citizens in the area impacted ONLY, and a referendum does not allow for this, since it becomes a county-wide vote.

I am for the Wegman's, but if a vote of the Owings Mills only citizenry were possible and they voted against it, I would understand. You say the zoning process has been hi-jacked. Putting it in the hands of the voters county-wide makes this worse. Who is to stop the developers from promising a new shopping center in Essex or Woodlawn for their votes against the project in Owings Mills?

Comment_arrow

Michael

11:28 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

And btw, for someone posting for the first time here, you really should choose a more appropriate profile name, unless it is your intention to object to my every post in an attempt to get me to "wake up".

Comment_arrow

Chuck Burton

12:00 pm on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

And, as I said before, the lawyers will LOVE it!!!

Comment_arrow

Maryland

12:29 pm on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

wakeupmichael, how was the zoning process hijacked? Did you not attend the public hearing? Can you point out one example how the CZMP process was different this time? Personally, I don't want someone in Middle River voting on the fate of my Wegmans, just as I don't feel I have the right to vote on the location of their Walmart.

Comment_arrow

ReisterstownMAN

1:06 pm on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

You talk about protecting baltimore county businesses?
GIANT IS NOT A REISTERSTOWN BUSINESS! NOR IS A SAFEWAY...IS THIS WHAT YOU ARE PROTECTING?
THEY ARE FRANCHISES THAT ARE MONEY HUNGRY AND WANT IT ALL TO THEMSELVES.
Lets not forget we have a MARS in Reisterstown that still has business and is not fased by a monopoly in the area GIANT, that has 2 locations within a 10 mile radius..a total of 3 stores on REisterstown RD and a 4th on Reisterstown RD plaza...
so they are scared a little business will be going to WEGMANS.. and so are you...

ReisterstownMAN

1:03 pm on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

So what you are saying is....if a store wants to come to DUNDALK...I SHOULD CARE?
LMAO!!
I DONT CARE WHAT GOES INTO A DUNDALK LOCATION
I CARE ABOUT REISTERSTOWN/PIKESVILLE/OWINGS MILLS!
Dundalk folks should not be voting on a WEGMANS Coming to owings mills!

Reply

ReisterstownMAN

1:07 pm on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

the ones who dont support WEGMANS are people who want empty buildings in the area...
look at OWINGS MILLS MALL...30 years it has taken for someone to speak out....
1 security gaurd....pot holes,no stores, no workers, disgusting, crime, etc etc etc..
this is what you want I see...

Reply

Chuck Burton

1:58 pm on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

One thing I'm not clear on: does this referendum even apply to zoning decisions already made? If it does, every zoning decision in Districts 2 and 6 is at risk and must be referred to the public of the county as a whole for a final decision (except then it can go to the courts and make the lawyers happy).

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael

2:11 pm on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

That is what is unclear. The referendum would not be until the November 2014 election. How can they stop 2+ years of work that has already been done on the projects that they are objecting to?

Buck Harmon

5:28 pm on Tuesday, October 16, 2012

O, and by the way....the lawyers DO love it...Smith clan included..

Reply

Tom Kiefaber

12:30 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Yada, yada. So many fervent opinions expressed with sound and fury, yet so little awareness of the complex, interrelated issues involved.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chuck Burton

1:54 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Things are really not that complex.
1. Owings Mills, despite being named a growth area in the Baltimore County Master Plan, has been in decline for some years.
2. Wegmans, a grocery chain with an excellent reputation, has identified the former SOLO cup factory as a desireable location for a store which would help improve the image and reputation of Owings Mills, and a reputable developer has purchased the property and wants to accomodate Wegmans, along with other retailers and offices.
3. Several other developers do not wish that competition with their own plans, and have mounted a campaign to sidetrack it, using, in part legitimate concern about traffic in and around the property.
4. The would-be developer of the property has come up with plans that would, at his own expense, at least largely alleviate the traffic problems, and has satisfied the concerns of the zoning authorities and the County Council, which have given their go-ahead.
5. The other developers have now mounted a political campaign to halt, or seriously delay the development of the property in question, whether the people of the neighborhood want it or not, and even though it would tend to further the decline of the region.
6. SOMETHING will eventually go into that property. Will it be as desireable as Wegmans
It's only as complex as people make it out to be.

Leave a comment