Lansdowne Man Pleads Guilty to Civil Rights Violation
Billy Ray Pratt, Jr., 24, faces up to 10 years in prison for hanging a dead raccoon from a noose on a neighbor's porch.
A Lansdowne man has pleaded guilty for his role in hanging a dead raccoon on the porch of a family from Africa, according to officials at the U.S. Department of Justice.
Billy Ray Pratt, Jr., 24, of the 300-block of Fourth Avenue, faces up to 10 years in prison and $250,000 fine for conspiracy to deprive a person of civil rights. He faces sentencing Aug. 17.
Two other co-conspirators were charged in the incident. Joshua Wall, 20, of Essex, pleaded guilty on March 5 and faces the same maximum penalty, officials said.
According to a statement of facts signed by Pratt as part of his plea, between April 26-30, 2010, Pratt, Wall and three others conspired to intimidate and threaten a family because of their color.
At the time, Pratt was living with friends in Middle River. On April 26, his host's son got into a fight with a black juvenile who lived in the neighborhood. After the fight, Pratt and others went to the scene and used racial slurs and threats directed at the family, according to the statement.
Later, the group went home and hatched a scheme to hang a raccoon from the family's porch. According to the statement of facts, Pratt drove around for two days until he found a dead raccoon.
On April 29, Pratt, Wall and another man tied a noose around the raccoon carcass and, in the middle of the night, walked over to the victim family's house and hung it from the porch, court documents said.
According to officials, Pratt and the others discussed and understood the racial significance of their act, and its intent to frighten the victims.
The victim family explored the idea of moving but ultimately stayed in the neighborhood, officials said.
Sean Tully
12:36 pm on Saturday, April 28, 2012
What confuses me about this story (and not just this Patch account of it) is it is not clear whether the three co-conspirators hatched this plan in retaliation for the earlier fight or was it designed to drive the family from the home based on race? Maybe the initial fight was over the black family's being in the neighborhood? More info needed.
Bruce Goldfarb
6:19 pm on Saturday, April 28, 2012
You never know where the ill-will arises from, but based on the statement of facts, the proximate incident leading to the raccoon-hanging was the fight.
Bruce Goldfarb
6:48 pm on Saturday, April 28, 2012
Sean, I've uploaded the plea agreement and statement of facts as a PDF document so you can read it yourself.
Sean Tully
5:57 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012
Okay, I read the statement of facts. Thanks Bruce. Its reads as if the co-conspirators intended the racoon to be a threat against the victims and not specifically a message that they should move away, although the victims did consider moving.
Chuck
6:12 pm on Saturday, April 28, 2012
The headlines of your article are deceiving.
Bruce Goldfarb
6:19 pm on Saturday, April 28, 2012
How are they deceptive, Chuck?
Chuck
6:28 pm on Saturday, April 28, 2012
Because they imply that the crime occured in Lansdowne.
Bruce Goldfarb
6:46 pm on Saturday, April 28, 2012
With all due respect, Chuck, that isn't what the headline says or suggests.
Chuck
7:24 pm on Saturday, April 28, 2012
The neighbors porch was in Middle River.
Pattie Gerlach Archuleta
7:30 pm on Saturday, April 28, 2012
I believe the headline accurately states "Lansdowne man," not "Lansdowne porch."
Chuck
7:48 pm on Saturday, April 28, 2012
Bruce, you do a good job, but simply put for the pedestrian Patch browser - Lansdowne man at present, yes. Lansdowne porch, no.
Sean Tully
12:47 am on Sunday, April 29, 2012
Chuch, the headline reads perfectly fine. It does not imply anything about Lansdowne except that the "man" who was charged was from there.
Granny Sue
11:51 am on Sunday, April 29, 2012
The confusion may stem from the sub title- "for hanging a dead raccoon from a noose on a neighbor's porch". The Title says a Lansdowne man and then the subtitle says a neighbor's porch without reading the article one may summize that the "neighbor's porch" was also in Lansdowne..
Sean Tully
1:23 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012
Hmm...upon further review, you have a point Granny Sue and Chuck. I didn't notice the subtitle as I already read about this incident in the Sunpapers. It's a tricky story for a local Patch as one of the co-conspirators was from Lansdowne but the incident happened in Middle River.
Chuck
1:55 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012
Thank You Granny Sue ! That's exactly my point.